On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:46:55PM +0100, Radosaw Grzanka wrote: > So you are proposing some kind of switch to darcs like "--machine-mode"? > This is completely different solution from what I've understood from your > previous post.
Perhaps that's because you missed my earlier post: http://www.abridgegame.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2005-November/008652.html > In machine-mode we could provide constant api which wouldn't change even > if users taste change. If i.e. 'revert' command would change in the > future due to change in terminology to let's say 'undo' we wouldn't care > for machine mode. No, that's not the point. The point is that only the output of darcs needs to be modified to be easy to parse. > Mixing user's interface with machine's interface is not really good > idea. That is ofcourse only my opininon but I think there will be trouble > with it. Maintaining a separate API will also cause trouble. Trouble is unavoidable. -- David Roundy http://www.darcs.net _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
