>>>>> "David" == David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> PLEASE run darcs check on all your repositories using the
David> new release of darcs. This is safe for you, and will give
David> me greater confidence in the correctness of the rewritten
David> patch application code.
I've got a few others stashed away, but 15/15 repos yield
"consistent".
All are small (less than 250 patches), but most are largish (80MB of
code under darcs control, with a few patches in the 1MB range. The
large ones are all recent branches of XEmacs, so hardly independent
tests.
On thing that may be unusual is that I have done a _lot_ of unrecord/
revert/rerecord kinds of operations (I'm experimenting with workflows
appropriate to use of darcs for personal branch management even if the
project doesn't turn to darcs). Several of these branches have more
than twice as many patches in _darcs/patches as darcs knows about.
OTOH, I rarely record conflict resolutions.
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
