"Gaetan Lehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:54:14 +0100, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:34:44PM +0900, Jens Petersen wrote:
> >> Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
> >> > I can't get why, but I can't reproduce that problem today. The test
> >> > pass without problem !
> >>
> >> > Perhap's Jens can still reproduce it ?
> >>
> >> Yep, but only in the Fedora Extras buildsystem, which uses mock to
> >> build in a
> >> minimal buildroot. It build fine with mock on my own workstation.
> >>
> >> For now I'm just skipping send.sh for Fedora Extras.
> >
> > Ah, I think I know what it is. Darcs requires that /usr/sbin/sendmail be
> > present (during configure) in order to hard-code the path to the binary
> > that will be used for sending email. You can get around this by
> > specifying
> >
> > ./configure --with-sendmail=/usr/sbin/sendmail
> >
> > when configuring. If darcs has no idea where to locate sendmail, the
> > email-sending capability is turned off--even if --with-sendmail is passed
> > to darcs on the command line.
It works even if have_sendmail is set to false by configure when
--sendmail-command is used.
External.hs:351
if have_sendmail || scmd /= "" then do ...
> > The debian build scripts have a
> > mailer as a
> > build-dependency (which is indeed a nasty hack).
> >
> > Another approach would just to be to hard-code /usr/sbin/sendmail if we
> > can't locate a sendmail at configure time...
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
> using
>
> %configure --with-sendmail=%{_sbindir}/sendmail
>
> in the spec file is fine to me.
>
> However, shoudn't send.sh be disabled if darcs is build without mail
> support ?
The send.sh test passes for me even if i move the the sendmail binary
away and recompile darcs.
Mail support is always enabled, you just have to specify the sendmail
command if there is no default one.
Benedikt
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
