C:\XXXXXXXXXXX\working>darcs resolve No conflicts to resolve. On 12/14/05, Lst Recv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/14/05, Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > and then push to it, I get files that are out of sync from the > > > pushee. Stuff from old versions crops up. > > > > > darcs whatsnew shows nothing (as it should). > > > > Hmm, I've never seen something like that. What does ``darcs check'' say? > > C:\XXXXXXXXX\working>darcs check > Applying patch 63 of 63... done. > The repo is consistent! > > > > > Can we have a copy of the repo? (Don't send it to the list, put a tar > > on the web somewhere.) > > > > I'm sorry, I'm doing it for employment and don't have the right to give it > out. > > > (Stephen, relax. Except for the fact that he's posting anonymously, > > which I agree is annoying, the OP is behaving fine.) > > > > Juliusz > > > > Thanks for the help, Juliusz. Like I said, darcs is very appealing, > but these frequent stumbling blocks are proving to be quite difficult. > Let me know if there's any other info you need. >
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
