I'm getting the following, and I don't understand why obliterate would
be able to fail in this case. I can send the repo to a particular
developer if someone is interested, but I can't share it with everyone,
sorry [1]
- Jim Bruce
% darcs --version
1.0.5 (release)
% darcs whatsnew
No changes!
% darcs obliterate
Fri Oct 21 20:24:22 EDT 2005 bruce <at> andrev.cmu.edu
* Post RoboCup fixes
Made code compile and work with gcc-3.4. Navigation is fixed so that
velocity-space obs avoid should mostly work now. A "chicken" play was
added to test/demonstrate it. Joystick code was improved and a few
bugs fixed. Finally, the visualization of the passing evaluation
function was made prettier.
Shall I obliterate this patch? (1/20) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: y
Fri Oct 21 20:02:52 EDT 2005 bruce <at> andrev.cmu.edu
* Game state bug
This is a fix for free kicks in the game state class. It should fix
the bug at RoboCup 2004 that kept us "stuck" in freekicks once regular
play had started.
Shall I obliterate this patch? (2/20) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: d
darcs failed: Unable to apply inverse patch!
user error (Error applying hunk to file ./shared/serial.cc)
% darcs whatsnew -ls
M ./simulator/simulator.cc -1 +3
M ./soccer/attacker.cc -2 +2
M ./soccer/dribble_shoot.cc -1 +1
...
Any ideas?
[1] This is code meant to be entered in an annual competition, which is
unfortunately too competitive to allow other teams access to our code
midway through the year. We do make source code releases after the
competitions however, and also write plenty of papers on our algorithms.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
