> http://bugs.darcs.net/issue79
> I sent in a workaround for this, but as far as I know it was rejected.
I try to be very clear (some would say rude) when I reject a patch.
For every patch you send, you should see feedback on darcs-devel
unless I push the patch.
I do not mind seeing patches multiple times; quite the contrary, it
means I don't miss any.
> I can't really tell when patches are accepted.
I've got the following patches of yours in my mailbox:
- ``Do not reread freshly written patch when recording'', rejected
due to Ian's opposition (which I happen to disagree with, but he's
the better Haskell programmer); I'll accept this patch when you
convince Ian;
- three patches dated 14 Jan 2006, which I will push as soon as you
find a better name instead of ``--file'' (as I've mentioned, I like
``--logfile'', but it's up to you, I'm only doing the complaining);
- ``Add -i as an alias for --interactive'', which should get in (I was
waiting for somebody to object, but nobody has for now).
If there's anything that I've lost, please resubmit it or complain
with the message-id of the submission.
> The more fundamental problem here is that we have been relying on the
> laziness of haskell to make it efficient to read files and whatnot but
> IMO this won't cut it anymore and we're going to have to design this
> explicitly into darcs.
I would tend to agree, but I happen to believe that Ian disagrees with
that. And both of you are better Haskell programmers than I am, so I
can only make conservative decisions when you disagree.
Juliusz
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
