> > [I think that] you could benefit from automated patch tracking. > > Nobody ever claimed the contrary. I would be very grateful if > somebody conceived a usable patch tracking system. > > The current system is that patches end up in a specific mailbox, where > they are marked ``pending'' when I first notice them. I delete a > patch from the mailbox when it either gets pushed or rejected. > > The main advantage of this system over existing patch trackers is that > I do not need to use a web browser.
Juliusz, Have you tried the patchtracker I put up at http://butter.homeunix.net/darcs-patches/ yet? From what you just said, I take it you wouldn't see it as a replacement for your current system which doesn't need a web browser. But do you find any use in it? As I said in a previous email, as long as some people find it useful I'm willing to leave it up, but if it helps you, all the better. If I do decide to keep it up, it'll need some tweaking. But it is written in Perl and I'm going to avoid fixing it up for as long as possible. Sometimes, if I look at Perl directly, I throw up on my shoes. -- Zachary P. Landau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
