On Friday 01 December 2006 10:35, David Roundy wrote: > Is dspam that much more effective than spamassassin? It has the > disadvantage of not being packaged for debian sarge, which is what the > server is running. The many spams that are needing to be moderated are all > rated below 5 by spamassassin. And the darcs-devel moderator is also > finding the spam hard to keep up with. But we get (on darcs-devel) one > unique non-member posting a month, which our moderator considers worth > leaving it open for (and I agree).
It's far, far more effective--I'm getting 99.44% after just two weeks, with no corpus training. It's several orders of magnitude better than heuristic filters. And, dspam has been backported (http://backports.org) to sarge, which is how I'm using it. -- Truth has always been found to promote the best interests of mankind... - Percy Bysshe Shelley _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
