Quoting Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hmm... using darcs to distributedly manage files where some of them have > somewhat restrictive copyrights, has anyone even considered that in the > design? I don't know how to do it with darcs... I suppose you've > considered just making non-darcs-related patches and discarded that > notion :)
Yes, the notion of making patches without darcs doesn't appeal. I'd just end up putting those patches under darcs' control, anyway. And, since darcs is good at making patches, it doesn't make sense to darcs-ify externally-generated patches. Does anyone else know what I should do? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
