-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Josef Svenningsson wrote: > How about creating a patch bundle using 'darcs send'? It would be slightly > less convenient for anyone who wants to apply the patches, first > downloading > the bundle and then doing 'darcs apply' instead of simply a 'darcs pull'. > But it still seems reasonable to me. > > Josef >
Does the "context" 'darcs send' gives reveal any sensitive information? Just the names and descriptions of patches, not their contents, I think. Also is it a problem if the patches reveal former contents of lines that were deleted by the patch, or non-modified parts of lines that were modified (very small portions of the original document)? Isaac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGdGahHgcxvIWYTTURAiP6AJ9ZXpn7osiosIJePE669J+1J+3eyACeJZ9A XmHGkS6hc4zVXw+OBNHH120= =8r8i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
