On Apr 29, 2008, at 9:01 AM, Ashley Moran wrote: > On 23 Apr 2008, at 00:00, zooko wrote: > >> 2. Starting using hashed-format repositories. > > Interesting benchmarks! What about the darcs 2 repository format?
I didn't try it. Here -- now that you ask so nicely, I'll do so. Okay, the result is that darcs-2-format performs exactly the same way that hashed-format does on the "darcs get --lazy" test. > If you have no need to preserve darcs 1 compatability, should you > switch to the new format? How come you didn't do that in this case? I need to preserve compatibility to darcs-1 for now. > Which is supposed to be faster? I think the point of the darcs-2-format is new improved patch semantics: http://wiki.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/DarcsTwo Regards, Zooko _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
