On 29 Apr 2008, at 16:36, zooko wrote: > I didn't try it. Here -- now that you ask so nicely, I'll do so.
That wasn't an order to re-run the benchmarks, just a question :) But thanks anyway > Okay, the result is that darcs-2-format performs exactly the same > way that hashed-format does on the "darcs get --lazy" test. > > I think the point of the darcs-2-format is new improved patch > semantics: Ok, since I have no need to preserve darcs-1 compatability and the new format is as fast as the hashed one, I'll continue to use darcs-2 repos. Cheers Ashley -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://aviewfromafar.net/ _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
