Peter Hercek wrote: > 3) Make darcs really patch based: > > a) Amend-record should be safe. This probably means > that a hierarchy should be added to patches. > A patch (as seen in darcs log and other UI commands) > should be composed of a sequence of patches so > amending a patch would add the "amendment" to it and > it would not be a problem when the original patch > was already pushed (the "amendment" would get pushed > the next time). It should be possible to look at > components of a patch then. > While I agree that it should be safe, for me 'safe' means 'does not corrupt repository'.
I usually make a version that passes all the tests, then refactor and amend it until it's what I want. I don't want these intermediate versions be in the patch. Also it has happened, that I accidentally added and recorded wrong third party DLL's into my project. amend-record should not include them. The few times I really wanted to amend a patch that was in two repositories, I just unrecorded it. Kari _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
