Ketil Malde wrote:
> The consequences of moving to the darcs-2 format are a bit unclear to
> me. For instance, I'd like to keep my main (export) repo in darcs-1
> format, in order to make it as accessible as possible (Ubuntu still
> ships with darcs-1.0.9, and that's a fairly cutting edge
> distribution.) Can I convert my working repos to darcs-2? Should I?
> How about darcs-hashed? In short, I'd like to see examples of
> recommended migration strategies, and associated benefits.
Does my article seem to answer most/all of these? I just realized that
maybe a summary table or two might help... I'll add something like the
following to the next update, perhaps:
======= ================= =================
Format Darcs 1 push/pull Darcs 2 push/pull
======= ================= =================
darcs-1 Yes Yes
hashed **No** Yes
darcs-2 **No** Yes
======= ================= =================
===================================
Convertible to...
===================================
======= ======= ============= ===========
Format darcs-1 hashed darcs-2
======= ======= ============= ===========
darcs-1 - Yes Yes (Once!)
hashed Yes - Yes (Once!)
darcs-2 **No** **No** -
======= ======= ============= ===========
(All conversions performed by darcs 2 operations.)
--
--Max Battcher--
http://www.worldmaker.net/
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
