On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:52:42 +0200 Ben Franksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ketil Malde wrote: > > The consequences of moving to the darcs-2 format are a bit unclear > > to me. For instance, I'd like to keep my main (export) repo in > > darcs-1 format, in order to make it as accessible as possible > > (Ubuntu still ships with darcs-1.0.9, and that's a fairly cutting > > edge distribution.) Can I convert my working repos to darcs-2? > > No. You cannot push or pull between darcs-2 format repos and darcs-1 > or hashed format repos. This might not be optimal but is > understandable, since the theory underlying the darcs-2 repository > format is different. Tailor should be able to handle the simplest scenario, a one way conversion between your working repos (in darcs-2 format) to your public (darcs-1 format) one, but that's just moving the problem elsewhere: what about new patches sent against the public repo? I never tried myself, but I wonder if a dual way could work between darcs and darcs... hth, ciao, lele. -- nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
