Simon Michael wrote: >> "You should not unrecord, amend or re-record patches which have already >> propagated to other repositories, as these changes are local only. (To >> change recorded patches in a way that propagates, record an additional >> patch or use darcs rollback.)" Peter B. West wrote: > Even this change takes a bit of parsing. and: > However, I don' know enough about the issues to suggest a better > wording. The more I think about it, the more uncertain I become.
Maybe something less prescriptive would work, like this: "Patches that have been either unrecorded and re-recorded or amended will conflict with previous copies of the patch, where they meet." Maybe with "You could record a new patch or use rollback, instead.", if necessary. Grant. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
