Grant Husbands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Michael wrote: >>> "You should not unrecord, amend or re-record patches which have already >>> propagated to other repositories, as these changes are local only. (To >>> change recorded patches in a way that propagates, record an additional >>> patch or use darcs rollback.)" > Peter B. West wrote: >> Even this change takes a bit of parsing. > and: >> However, I don' know enough about the issues to suggest a better >> wording. The more I think about it, the more uncertain I become. > > Maybe something less prescriptive would work, like this: > > "Patches that have been either unrecorded and re-recorded or amended > will conflict with previous copies of the patch, where they meet."
+1 Rather than just saying "you shouldn't do this," saying "this <bad thing> will happen if you do this." _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
