On Aug 21, 2008, at 17:02 PM, Dan Pascu wrote: > While you praise all the new goodies in darcs2, you should also > mention > that it has bugs that prevent it from working (I'm not referring > here to > performance issues). See for example issue966: > > http://bugs.darcs.net/issue966
This is the first I've heard of this one, Dan. I guess I don't use "darcs diff" myself, and I haven't been following the issue tracker closely. I agree with you that regressions like this are a high priority. Maybe we should mark it as a higher priority in the issue tracker? I'm not sure what "critical" and "urgent" priorities are currently used for. Regards, Zooko http://allmydata.org -- Tahoe, the Least-Authority Filesystem http://allmydata.com -- back up all your files for $5/month _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
