Hi Dan, On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:02:42 +0300, Dan Pascu wrote: > While you praise all the new goodies in darcs2, you should also mention > that it has bugs that prevent it from working (I'm not referring here to > performance issues). See for example issue966: > > http://bugs.darcs.net/issue966
Thanks for pointing out why this bug is important. Revisiting that bug, I have submitted a test case (by the way, this is really easy to do; just make a simple shell script and put it in the bugs directory) and upgraded its priority. > IMO, such bugs that cripple or make darcs-2 unusable in certain situations > should be higher on the priority list of fixes for the next release than > performance enhancing fixes, especially if the aforementioned situations > are pretty common Are there any other bugs in particular you feel we're not taking seriously enough? Performance will be the central theme for our next major release, but this will not stop us from fixing major bugs along the way. Thanks! -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpS6YgZo8kgO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
