Sorry, this one came while my email was broken (thank you anti-spammers!). On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Simon Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm resending some patches from > http://joyful.com/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=darcs-sm > that didn't get a response. This bundle contains two patches with darcsweb > diff links for easier viewing, and some more description. Feedback welcome. > > Wed Aug 6 21:03:23 PDT 2008 Simon Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * make test-running targets & docs a little clearer > > As a newcomer trying to make myself useful by running tests, I found the > makefile test targets ("check test", "tests", "bugs", "unit" which only > builds the tests, and various "test_" targets) non-obvious. This patch > introduces slightly more mnemonic and future-proof "unittests" and > "functests" targets, and updates the docs. > > http://joyful.com/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=darcs-sm;a=commitdiff;h=20080807040323-3c3f9-e00fff45c938b6f074bf5720acf5edfdcdcbc687.gz
I find your refactored targets more confusing, sorry. make check or make test seems perfectly intuitive to me. In fact, they're standard targets. > Thu Aug 7 01:43:43 PDT 2008 Simon Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * "make bench" runs performance tests > > This patch addes a "bench" target and trivial harness for running the > tests in bench/. There's only one, but this seems like something we want > to increase. I don't see this as a particularly good direction to go. Let's not codify this approach to creating a benchmark suite unless someone decides it's worth working on. As I understand things, there are people working on other benchmarking projects. David _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
