On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 15:52:45 +0100, Eric Kow wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:28:41 -0400, David Roundy wrote: > > I think this is a very bad idea. If benchmarking is going to be > > useful, it really should run with different versions of ghc. This > > might, for instance, have allowed us to catch the huge ghc 6.8 > > regression before ghc 6.8.2. > > Makes sense. Ganesh, would you mind sending your patches for benchpress > and maybench?
Whoops! I just realised that my first paragraph was awfully unclear. What I meant is that Ganesh had some patches to benchpress and maybench which allowed the two to compile on GHC 6.6. So hopefully we will have support for whatever GHC darcs can support (except for 6.4, but that is under discussion). -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
