On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:07:29AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: > > It might be worth mentioning in your documentation that while the > internals are similar to darcs 2, the semantics that you're > implementing is the semantics of darcs 1.
Are you referring to not treating duplicate patches specially? > That would be more honest than to say that your theory is similar to > that of darcs 2. I'm not deliberately trying to be dishonest :-) Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
