Thorkil Naur wrote: > [...] > Note here that the ls -ltr shows darcs244 existing, but darcs245 being > passed as the %a. > > I'd call this a bug in darcs. I would be grateful if you could confirm and > report the issue to the darcs bug tracker.
Confirmed! See the new issue1128. This shouldn't be too hard to fix. I am looking at the sources right now... Cheers Ben _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
