On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:59:03 -0400, David Roundy wrote: > Yes, any sort of mapping between files and patches that modify them > would do. It's a simple problem (albeit extremely tedious), so it > hasn't seemed worth documenting. Various people have volunteered to > do it (or one person twice), and I'm pretty certain it's in the bug > tracker as well.
Also adding to this, I remember on IRC some people worrying that this might be tricky with file/directory renames, and Taylor R Campbell pointing out that a conservative estimate would be good enough. I think that this means is putting into the map any patch which *might* touch a file, but doesn't necessarily do so. Anyway, in case anybody was worried about this being tricky, please keep in mind other simple options, such as the one I think Taylor suggested. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
