Simon Michael wrote: >> See also >> http://wiki.darcs.net/index.html/CategoryBinaries#head- >> c7910dd98302946c671cf63cb62712589b392074
zooko wrote: > This page shows a list of several alternative binaries. This > immediately violates Yitzchak Gale's #1 requirement, which was a > simple, foolproof installation method. It's OK, I understood that Simon meant that to be just for IT, not to send out to everyone. Thanks for the heads-up though. Assuming we can indeed deploy just the binary to unzip on top of the old directory, then the next question becomes: which binary should we deploy? Be conservative and deploy zooko's 2.0.0, or be daring and deploy Simon's 2.0.2 with patches? IT likes to be conservative, not daring. It is very costly if an unknown problem turns up on something that you deployed to everyone in the company. But on the other hand, pipelining (if it really does work well on Windows) and the bug fixes are very tempting. Any opinions? Thanks, Yitz _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
