Hi, "Dmitry Kurochkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I vote against disabling -Werror. I sometimes miss warnings in build > output. And -Werror guarantees that I would not miss it. I think we > should disable -Werror only if there is no way around it (or it is too > ugly). Conditional compilation for language extensions looks fine to > me. for that, I'd say (hope) there'd be better ways to address this than default -Werror. Maybe a cabal flag to turn it on for developers? Or maybe file a wishlist with cabal to have all the warnings appear again at the end of the compile run? What would you think, Duncan?
Yours, Petr. -- Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
