Hi, On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 13:14:32 -0800, Jason Dagit wrote: > I noticed we have some unused "stuff" in Arguments so I did a quick > bit of semi-mindless house keeping.
Thanks, any volunteers to review this? Christian? > PS There is quite a bit of social confusion about stable vs. unstable > and I noticed they are way out of sync. Please clarify that. Sorry about that. This is deliberate. We're still in transitionary state in which we are trying to get the buildbots green again after all that sprint work; we've had a quite a few hiccups, with the combination of the bytestring work and the recent makefile cleanups. Being lazy and quoting past-Eric http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2008-November/015506.html > My first priority as maintainer would be to complete the work from the > darcs sprint. I will be using the darcs unstable branch to merge in the > remaining changes over the next week. When the dust has settled, I will > transfer the patches over to the stable branch and probably collapse the two > branches again. The second priority is to ensure that darcs 2.1.1 is released > promptly, with GHC 6.10.1 support and otherwise no changes. So once those buildbots are green again, we can switch everything back to stable and collapse the branches. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpkIUcyeybRn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
