On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 18:39:38 +0000, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > - darcs executable has to adhere to package version policy > > (which may not be so bad) > > I don't follow that; nothing is /required/ to follow the policy, but if > anything should then it's the library.
Oh well I just assumed that you couldn't have two separate version fields in the same cabal file, and that since the library should follow the policy (if we want to be kind to other people writing cabal files in which libdarcs is a dependency), the executable would be forced to do so by default. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
