On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 06:51:18PM +0000, Eric Kow wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 18:39:38 +0000, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > > - darcs executable has to adhere to package version policy > > > (which may not be so bad) > > > > I don't follow that; nothing is /required/ to follow the policy, but if > > anything should then it's the library. > > Oh well I just assumed that you couldn't have two separate version > fields in the same cabal file, and that since the library should follow > the policy (if we want to be kind to other people writing cabal files in > which libdarcs is a dependency), the executable would be forced to do so > by default.
OK, yes; it isn't required, but it would make people happy if it did use the PvP. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
