On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 09:55:25AM +0000, Eric Kow wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 15:41:41 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > > But the --patch and --match options have no such caveat. > > Is this because they have not been documented as having such a caveat or > because the code for --patch and --match are actually more thorough?
Well, the expectation (for me, at least) is that --patch matches *a* patch (the latest match), and --to-patch matches a *set* of patches, up to and including the latest match. I suppose that therefore --patch is still susceptible to --reorder, but I think it's less likely to happen than --to-patch. I fear I'm not explaining this very well without a chalkboard :-( _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
