Tommy Pettersson <[email protected]> writes: > I hope I .. erh ... cleared this out. Well, most of the darcs options > most of the time does exactly what one needs and expects, so the > interface is good even if it can be complicated to give a formal > explanation of how it "really" works. The show contents command's > options are not completely clear to me though. --from-foo wouldn't > make any sens, so that's probably why the --to-foo options are not > available, so the --foo options serve as --to-foo instead. But the > --index option violates this "model". Perhaps the --index option > should be split into an --index=n, and a --range=n,m option? Or it > could have two different internal representations, so that one of them > requires a single index, whereas the other would accept a range too, > but they both would be called --index (-n), just like -p is sometimes > --patch and sometimes --patches.
This is starting to really hurt my brain, so I'm going to put it at the bottom of my IN tray and re-examine it when if gets back to the top of the stack. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
