Cc'ing Karen On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 16:44:11 +0000, Ian Lynagh wrote: > Does that mean we have to post pieces of paper back and forth? And again > each time we add/remove someone?
Would this be a big problem if it was the case? > > shall represent the > > roject in its official communication with the Conservancy. [Members of > > the Oversight Committee may be added or removed from the Committee at > > any time by a majority vote of the Oversight Committee.] > > Tied => no action? As Florent points out, we can keep the ensure that size of the Committee prevents a tie. As for abstentions, I guess they would count as 'no action' > > The Oversight > > Committee will elect a single individual to communicate with the > > Conservancy (the "Representative") and shall notify the Conservancy > > I'm not sure if this means Eric/the-representative should be on the > committee or not. My intention was that the representative and the committee be two different people, and I'm sure we can make that clear. No particular reason though, and no plans to insist on it one way or the other. > > promptly following the election of a new Representative. The > > Representative will have the authority to instruct the Conservancy on > > the Project's behalf on all matters. [This section may be modified by a > > vote of at least 3/4 of the Oversight Committee, > > Rounding in which direction? > > > with the consent of the > > Conservancy, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld.] > > > Thanks > Ian -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpthR6K6MkT4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
