Eric Kow <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 16:56:02 +0100, Thorkil Naur wrote: >> I agree. I have in mind to create a new topic for each release. And >> describe this convetion somewhere. Right now, however, I have only >> created the ReleaseTarget-2009-01 topic, intending it for release >> critical issues for the 2009-January release
What's wrong with the existing "critical" priority (severity)? I guess that critical unresolved tickets will get sorted to the top, which is a good thing. >> but I never said anything about it (except for >> http://wiki.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/BugTrackerKeywordTopicValues). But, >> in case you agree with this, I suggest that you use the >> ReleaseTarget-2009-01 topic for release critical issues for >> darcs-2.2. > > The current 'ReleaseGoal' target is probably also being used for this > purpose as well, so the corresponding bugs should perhaps be updated to > use the newer 'ReleaseTarget-2009-01' Would it be clearer to call say "Milestone-2009-01"? If this convention continues, will the resulting proliferation of topics (keywords) cause problems? Once we pass a milestone, what happens to open milestone tickets that didn't get fixed before the milestone? Will someone have to go through and "bump" the milestone topic with which they'r associated? _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
