On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 21:02:56 +0100, Florent Becker wrote:
> I was not in my usual repository: i wanted to use trackdown to see where
> the tests started failing, but i needed all quickcheck related patches
> to be commuted as far back in the past as possible. This was so that I
> could use qc 2.1 to test the state of darcs much before the 2.1 tests
> were introduced. So i pulled the two quickcheck 2.1 patches with all
> their dependencies into an empty repo, then the rest of darcs.net. Maybe
> that explains. By the way, this is a very very cool use case for
> commutation rather than git/hg history manipulation!

Great to hear the world still make sense :-)  I guess git/hg folks would
probably say that they could just as easily rebase the patches or
something.

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to