On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:41:48 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Equally likely, they'd say "use Mercurial queues/Stacked Git/quilt". > IMO, that's the real competition for Darcs (in terms of patch theory; > for simply tracking history of a branch, Darcs's user interface is > still ahead of the competition, but git is catching up fast).
Indeed Jakub Narebski (a git user and bit of a developer) says that really darcs should be compared with something like topgit and not git itself: http://repo.or.cz/w/topgit.git (he also thinks that hey, maybe the notion of patch commutation would be useful for something like topgit) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
