"Trent W. Buck" <[email protected]> writes: >> The net effect of the ordering change is that when you pull from a completely >> new repository, it will be added as a first item to _darcs/prefs/repos >> instead >> of last. The function doesn't seem to be used for _darcs/prefs/sources, where >> ordering *does* matter (*but* current darcs gets it wrong anyway, so...). > > Thanks, Petr. Do you think this patch should be applied as-is, or > should I amend it to avoid the reversal? I'd vote for a patch removing add_to_list altogether and using Data.List.union in its place. Otherwise, I have no preference -- reversal is fine with me.
Yours, Petr. -- Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
