On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 16:09:40 +0100, Reinier Lamers wrote: > And as I wondered but apparently forgot to write down: does it do the right > thing wrt the exit code of darcs? Shouldn't darcs exit with a non-zero code > if > it fails to dist?
Hmm... looks like I reacted too fast (I figured the rm -rf / rm -f wasn't big enough of a deal to hold patch application, but this looks like it could use some discussion). Ok, I'll hang on to this patch for a while... -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
