On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 22:52:25 +0300, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > Moreover libwww is not maintained for several years (even Debian plans > to remove it). So I see no reason to keep it. > > Unless someone really uses it.
Thanks! I think we're going to have to say "tough luck" to people using libwww. We'd love for darcs to work with whatever the user has available, but we must counterbalance that desire with our need to make the best use of developer resources. So I would welcome a patch removing libwww support... -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
