David gave the go-ahead, but Eric wrote:

It sounds like http://code.haskell.org/darcs/tracker might be the
appropriate place for this.

My idea is to use code.haskell.org as a more freewheeling environment
for people to work on darcs stuff, while leaving darcs.net for darcs
proper.

I think it's simpler to expose the repo already on darcs.net, where this service has to run, rather than add a copy on c.h.o which has to be kept in sync and buys us nothing much. Am I wrnog ?
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to