On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:38:58 -0700, Simon Michael wrote: > I think it's simpler to expose the repo already on darcs.net, where this > service has to run, rather than add a copy on c.h.o which has to be kept > in sync and buys us nothing much. Am I wrnog ?
I'm guessing that the only reason it would be good to have the repository on darcs.net is if http://darcs.net/tracker was the same exact repository as the one being used by roundup as it's running. I suppose I could figure out how to arrange that. Otherwise, if you think we're going to need to have two repositories anyway, I don't see the harm of one of the public one being on c.h.o (which buys us the ability for a wider circle of folks to be able to push directly to the repository, plus adding to that circle)... -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
