On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 18:16:52 +0000, Eric Kow wrote: > I'm going to go ahead and push a darcs replace patch transforming that > HAVE_LIBCURL into HAVE_CURL
Hmm, on second thought, I'm *not* going to push such a patch, because we do seem to have a long history of using HAVE_LIBCURL (and HAVE_CURL). I'll leave this to somebody else to sort out what is the right way to resolve this, i.e. whether we always mean HAVE_LIBCURL when we say HAVE_CURL or whether the two things mean different things (e.g. the curl program?) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
