Hi Eric. On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Eric Kow <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 18:16:52 +0000, Eric Kow wrote: >> I'm going to go ahead and push a darcs replace patch transforming that >> HAVE_LIBCURL into HAVE_CURL > > Hmm, on second thought, I'm *not* going to push such a patch, because we > do seem to have a long history of using HAVE_LIBCURL (and HAVE_CURL). > > I'll leave this to somebody else to sort out what is the right way to > resolve this, i.e. whether we always mean HAVE_LIBCURL when we say > HAVE_CURL or whether the two things mean different things (e.g. the curl > program?)
I did not look at the patch, but AFAIK HAVE_LIBCURL and HAVE_CURL mean the same, darcs does not use curl program. Regards, Dmitry > > -- > Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> > PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkm1XlQACgkQBUrOwgisBPkmsgCgyVOd+f19Voe3ObmD6TWeMMkD > w9kAn3nFTUZAZJImS3/KHz2W8+yRCcCE > =G8uJ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > darcs-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users > > _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
