KQ <[email protected]> wrote: > To me, the level of danger here is 9 or more on a scale of 1-10. > > The reason is that as soon as I contribute a patch to an open source project > using my work identity, the lid just popped off Pandora's box. My personal > contribution just became a corporate contribution. [snipped] > The way darcs currently works, I have a large degree of safety, because I'm > asked for each repo. You have a small degree of annoyance because you're > asked > for each repo (which you already have the means to address). Reversing this > is > wrong, IMHO.
This seems to be getting out of hand. If Darcs gives you the option of setting a global user file and you accept, and you don't want a global user file set, then that's simply user error. All you have to do to avoid it is to not blindly say yes to a prompt that's likely only going to appear when the repo has no author anyway. I know of many users who would find the option useful, and I don't think it's that dangerous. Regards, Grant Husbands. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
