On Friday 10 April 2009, Eric Kow wrote: > > As a second thought, this makes me also wonder if there'd be benefit > > in being able to: > > > > % darcs push --last-remote > > I'm not particularly keen on adding new switches to darcs unless there > is a compelling reason. So if we can find an acceptable workflow that > doesn't need one, that's better. New switches are nice when they cover > a lot of different ground at once on the other hand (thus obviating > any future requests for new switches...)
I agree. I'd hate to see darcs enter a creeping-featurism area. Commands and switches should be as generic and orthogonal as possible, avoiding commands or switches that are just particular shortcuts for particular workflows. -- Dan _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
