On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:39:26 +0200, Daniel Carrera wrote: > Given the performance and IO problems we've experienced with gitit, I > propose that we use a "static gitit" page such as the one produced by my > script. This would allow us to move forward and make progress until the > issues with gitit are resolved.
I think we should give darcsit (*) a second chance. Things have improved a bit during the hackathon: Petr has fixed --max-count, with which Gwern reports noticeable improvements (0.2s instead of 3s on one page). Also, filestore or maybe gitit itself have recently been improved to avoid calling darcs needlessly. As I understand it, the current plan is for us to get an instance running on one of his machines and to see if this works any better for us. (*) I keep forgetting that we need to call it that now. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpkXwTDGwZT0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
