Daniel Carrera writes: > My personal opinion is that running a website directly off of a SCM is a > mistake. But oh well.
What is a wiki (that provides history), if it's not an SCM? True, generic SCMs designed for interactive use during development may not be a good choice, and Darcs especially so since it's more interactive than most, and since its users feel much less need to script it than, say, git users. But I think there's nothing wrong with the principle of using an SCM. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
