On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:43:42AM -0400, Gwern Branwen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Trent W. Buck <[email protected]> wrote: > > Daniel Carrera <[email protected]> writes: > >>> Gitit uses filestore, and filestore aims at multiple backends. > >> > >> Doesn't seem like a valuable feature if the price is poor > >> performance. We don't need multiple backends. > > > > Gwern, would performance improve if darcs-wiki used a different backend? > > Well, the Git backend is plenty fast so there definitely would be an > improvement. But until someone converts the repo and tests it on > test.darcs.net, I couldn't say how much of a one. One order? 2? How > would it compare with a --max-count Darcsit? Dunno.
Sorry, I guess I misunderstood. IIRC you were saying that if gitit was using an sqlite backend, it wouldn't be able to look at mtimes. I thought you meant a filecache backend -- so the VCS would still be Darcs. Did you mean that sqlite was a (potential) alternative backend to darcs/git? _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
