On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Trent W. Buck <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:43:42AM -0400, Gwern Branwen wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Trent W. Buck <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Daniel Carrera <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Gitit uses filestore, and filestore aims at multiple backends. >> >> >> >> Doesn't seem like a valuable feature if the price is poor >> >> performance. We don't need multiple backends. >> > >> > Gwern, would performance improve if darcs-wiki used a different backend? >> >> Well, the Git backend is plenty fast so there definitely would be an >> improvement. But until someone converts the repo and tests it on >> test.darcs.net, I couldn't say how much of a one. One order? 2? How >> would it compare with a --max-count Darcsit? Dunno. > > Sorry, I guess I misunderstood. IIRC you were saying that if gitit > was using an sqlite backend, it wouldn't be able to look at mtimes. I > thought you meant a filecache backend -- so the VCS would still be > Darcs. Did you mean that sqlite was a (potential) alternative backend > to darcs/git?
Yes. John has coded up a mostly complete SQLite3 backend for filestore, although it's not complete and its main purpose right now is to prevent us from accidentally slipping in a DVCSism into filestore. -- gwern _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
