Eric Kow wrote:
Hi Petr,
Thanks to meeting and chatting with you at the hackathon, I have a much
better grasp of our current --hashed performance problems.
As you explained it, one problem is that on the one hand, hashed
pristine files can be shared across branches via hard-linking while on
the other hand, darcs operations in one branch will synch the timestamps
on those files with their working dir equivalents, thus invalidating the
timestamps for the other branch. (So far so good?)
Won't this issue disappear with the file index stuff anyway? It sounds
to me like yet another case for getting the file index stuff done.
--
--Max Battcher--
http://worldmaker.net
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
