On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:47:00 -0400, Max Battcher wrote:
>> pristine files can be shared across branches via hard-linking while on
>> the other hand, darcs operations in one branch will synch the timestamps
>> on those files with their working dir equivalents, thus invalidating the
>> timestamps for the other branch.  (So far so good?)
>
> Won't this issue disappear with the file index stuff anyway? It sounds  
> to me like yet another case for getting the file index stuff done.

It would.  I was just wondering if it would make sense to have a
temporary fix.  But anyway, it looks like the right thing for us to do
is to wait for the file index stuff.

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9

Attachment: pgpLC1C45yJUc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to